Louisa Chirico vs Harriet Dart Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How do Dart and Chirico fare when it comes to second serve points? Over the past six months, Dart has managed to win 37.66% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Chirico has fared slightly better, capturing 40.35% of her second serve points. This subtle edge can often influence match prediction decisions, especially when analyzing upcoming encounters.

Return game statistics prove equally enlightening. Looking at recent performances, Dart has won 50.37% of her opponent's second serve points, while Chirico remains marginally more successful at 51.46%. As for their ability to counter first serve returns, the stats stand close with Dart at 34.35% and Chirico at 34.11%. These figures offer a clearer insight into who might seize dominance during their head-to-head matchup.

The aspect of saving breakpoints adds another layer to the analysis. Dart has successfully saved 50% of breakpoints faced, positioning her with a slight advantage over Chirico, who has saved 44.66% of breakpoints. This metric is particularly useful for those placing in-game bets, where each breakpoint can significantly influence match dynamics.

Surveying their overall performance landscape over the past year, Dart's win rate lies at 45.65% (21/25), whereas Chirico boasts a 54.41% success rate (37/31). This broader snapshot provides a holistic view of their recent form, offering clues about who might emerge victorious in this showdown.

When we examine their favored playing surfaces, it's apparent Dart thrives on indoor hard courts with a winning percentage of 59% (67/47). Her performance dips on clay, where she holds a 45% win rate. Chirico, conversely, showcases her prowess on clay with a striking 61% win rate (165/104), yet she struggles on grass, claiming only 38% of matches.

Analyzing the level of competition, Dart predominantly competes in Masters series tournaments, securing victories in 42.86% of her matches (6/8). Chirico, on the other hand, has been more active in Challengers and ITF events, achieving a better 59.26% win rate (32/22). The event level plays a crucial role in predicting potential outcomes, as the competition faced can vary drastically.

Regarding their direct confrontations, they've crossed paths once before, splitting sets with Dart winning one and Chirico none, as the match at the National Bank Open - Toronto concluded with Chirico's victory due to Dart's retirement (4-6, 6-6 ret.). Their clash lasted an average duration of 2 hours and 4 minutes, adding intensity to their encounters. In deciding sets, Dart hasn't secured a win against Chirico, losing their singular deciding set face-off.

Their experience in tiebreak situations remains unexplored, as neither has secured a tiebreak win against the other. Dart's average opponent rank stands at 135.91, contrasting with Chirico's of 291.41, influencing their overall competitive exposure. Should this clash extend to a deciding set, historical performance suggests Dart might have the upper hand, having won 50% of these scenarios recently, whereas Chirico has only won 40%.

Considering recent form in converting breakpoints, Dart leads at 42.86%, whereas Chirico trails with a conversion rate of 38.32%. These figures provide useful insights for in-game betting, underscoring the competitive edge one player might hold over the other in critical moments.

Given these factors, while the stats suggest Chirico holds a slight edge in overall recent form and clay prowess, Dart's saving ability during pivotal moments might level the playing field. Hence, with all assessed elements, the scales tip toward a razor-thin prediction favoring Chirico, contingent on her ability to leverage superior return stats and previous match experience.